(Solved by Humans)-2 1 Less than Unsatisfactory Satisfactory 0.00% 74.00% 70.0

Question

?The two companies that need to be compared are PayPal and Square Inc.

For this assignment, apply the next three steps of the nine-step assessment process detailed in Assessing a Company?s Future Financial Health (i.e., Step 5: External Financing Need, Step 6: Target Sources of Finance, and Step 7: Viability of 3-5 Year Plan) to compose further assessment of the company/competitor pairing analysis as below:

1. Current financial plan. Interpret current equity valuations in order to recommend strategic solutions regarding future financial goals. Consider how stock splits and stock dividend allocations can impact the plan.
2. Future external financing needs. To support growth, companies need capital, and external financial needs are vital any firm?s future success. Describe external financing needs sufficient to support your ongoing analytical assumptions and pro forma financial statements for your chosen company and competitor.
3. Access to target sources of external financing. You will need to consider the amount of financing, timing, length of time required, and deferability of financing options.
4. Viability of a 3-5 Year Plan. Assess the consistency of the plan with the firm?s goals, and the achievability of both the operating plan and the financing plan you are proposing

2
1
Less than
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
0.00%
74.00%
70.0 %Content
The required
70.0 %
Incorporation set of
assessment
of the
Required Set elements and
of Assessment subsection data
Elements and is not present.
Subsection
Data

20.0
%Organization
&
Effectiveness
8.0 % Thesis Paper lacks any
Development discernible
and Purpose overall purpose
or organizing
claim.

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

The required setThe required set The required
The required set
of assessment of assessment
set of
of assessment
elements and
elements and
assessment
elements and
subsection data subsection data is elements and subsection data is
is incorporated, incorporated, but subsection data present and
but the
minimal detail or is present, and comprehensive.
information
support is
is incorporated The submission
provided is
provided for one in full. The
further
incomplete,
or more
submission
incorporates
inaccurate, or components.
encompasses
analysis of
otherwise
essential details supporting
deficient.
and provides
evidence
appropriate
insightfully and
support.
provides specific
examples with
relevance. Level
of detail is
appropriate.

Thesis is
Thesis is apparent Thesis is clear Thesis is
insufficiently
and appropriate and forecasts comprehensive
developed or
to purpose.
the
and contains the
vague. Purpose
development of essence of the
is not clear.
the paper.
paper. Thesis
Thesis is
statement makes
descriptive and the purpose of the
reflective of the paper clear.
arguments and
appropriate to
the purpose.
Statement of
Sufficient
Argument is
Argument
Clear and
7.0 %
purpose is not justification of orderly, but may shows logical convincing
Argument
justified by the claims is
have a few
progressions. argument that
Logic and
inconsistencies. Techniques of presents a
Construction conclusion. The lacking.
conclusion does Argument lacks The argument
argumentation persuasive claim
not support the consistent unity. presents minimal are evident.
in a distinctive
claim made.
There are
justification of
There is a
and compelling
Argument is
obvious flaws in claims. Argument smooth
manner. All
incoherent and the logic. Some logically, but not progression of sources are
uses
sources have
thoroughly,
claims from
authoritative.
noncredible
questionable
supports the
introduction to
sources.
credibility.
purpose. Sources conclusion.
used are credible. Most sources
Introduction and are
conclusion
authoritative.
bracket the
thesis.
Surface errors Frequent and
Some mechanical Prose is largely Writer is clearly
5.0 %
errors or typos
free of
in command of
Mechanics of are pervasive repetitive
enough that
mechanical
are present, but mechanical
standard, written,
Writing
they impede
errors distract they are not
errors,
academic English.
(includes
communication the reader.
overly distracting although a few
spelling,

punctuation, of meaning.
Inappropriate
grammar,
language use) word choice or
sentence
construction is
used.

Inconsistencies to the reader.
in language
Correct and
choice (register) varied sentence
or word choice structure and
are present.
audienceSentence
appropriate
structure is
language are
correct but not employed.
varied.

10.0 %Format
Template is not Appropriate
Appropriate
5.0 % Paper
template is
template is used.
Format (use of used
appropriately orused, but some Formatting is
appropriate
documentation elements are
correct, although
style for the
format is rarely missing or
some minor
major and
mistaken. A lack errors may be
assignment) followed
correctly.
of control with present.
formatting is
apparent.
Sources are not Documentation Sources are
5.0 %
of sources is
documented, as
Documentatio documented.
inconsistent or appropriate to
n of Sources
incorrect, as
assignment and
(citations,
appropriate to style, although
footnotes,
assignment and some formatting
references,
style, with
errors may be
bibliography,
numerous
present.
etc., as
formatting
appropriate to
errors.
assignment
and style)
100 %

may be present.
The writer uses
a variety of
effective
sentence
structures and
figures of
speech.

Appropriate
All format
template is fully elements are
used. There are correct.
virtually no
errors in
formatting
style.
Sources are
Sources are
documented, as completely and
appropriate to correctly
assignment and documented, as
style, and
appropriate to
format is mostly assignment and
correct.
style, and format
is free of error.